Internet Gambling

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)
Special interest groups, lobbyists, and religious moralists have sought and semi-banned US online gambling (I say semi because the UIGEA - Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, which is basically an update to the Wire Act, doesn't actually make it unlawful to gamble over the internet; it targets financial institutes).

Financially speaking, simple regulation instead of banning (and imposing on citizens choices), to a billion dollar industry would have been better for our economy.   It is also contradictory to ban ONLY certain kinds of gambling, but allow horse race betting and state run lotteries - aren't these too, gambling?

With the United States being the largest gambling nation (80%), our economic slow down will adversely affect gambling meccas like Costa Rica.   But, I have read somewhere that in times of economic slow down, gambling among the masses increases (I have also read that being against gambling is the morally correct choice.  However, I am opposed to anything that takes my freedom of choice away). 

It is ironic that I take this position, as Clinton favors gambling economically, yet Obama disfavors it morally.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Internet Gambling.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.latinopundit.com/~latinopu/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/331

1 Comments

Gambling said:

Well.. they need to legalize online gambling and get some tax dollars to fix this economy!

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Louis Pagan published on February 15, 2008 8:59 AM.

The Florida and Michigan Delegates was the previous entry in this blog.

Para Ganar Obama is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01